The #MeToo movement reveals years of sexual misconduct in children’s and YA literature

How should readers respond to authors’ immorality?

Adah McMillan, Copy and Design Editor

James Dashner, author of The Maze Runner and The Eye of Minds: dropped by publisher.

Jay Asher, author of Thirteen Reasons Why: dropped by agent.

Junot Diaz, author of The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao: withdrawn from the Sydney Writers’ Festival.

Richard Paul Evans, author of the Michael Vey series: banished from Salt Lake Comic Con.

Sherman Alexie, author of The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian: removed from the title of a scholarship.

Daniel Handler, author of A Series of Unfortunate Events: canceled as commencement speaker.

Nobel Prize in Literature: suspended.


The answer is the #MeToo movement. It has dug up years of sexual harassment, abuse, and assault in the world of children’s and young adult literature.

The main digger was author Anne Ursu, who collected over ninety stories of sexual/psychological/physical harassment in the writing industry and published them online. She says, “We work in children’s books, and we like to think we are different, somehow. We value ‘kindness.’ The ranks of publishers are populated with women. And everyone is so nice, right? But we aren’t different, and before we can do anything about sexual harassment, we need to face that reality. And the reality is that a culture of “kindness” can silence people who have been harassed, that women can be complicit in a culture of sexual harassment and gender discrimination, and that the people who we work alongside, whose books we care about, who we like, can be sexual harassers. Facing this reality is going to be ugly. But it is far uglier to pretend these problems aren’t here.” You can read her full essay here

Many prominent authors, including those aforementioned, were exposed by Ursu and other participants in the #MeToo movement. James Dashner, Jay Asher, and Daniel Handler have had their books made into movies/TV shows. But their violations range from offensive comments to outright assault.

From what I’ve read and in my opinion, Handler is a huge sexist jerk who also happens to speak to elementary school children. Women have told of rude jokes he’s said that made them very uncomfortable, but they didn’t say anything because he’s such a powerful figure in children’s literature.

Junot Diaz, a Pulitzer Prize winner, convinced Alisa Valdes to sleep with him in return for his assistance in advancing her career. He later apologized and told the story of his own rape as a child, which apparently justifies his actions. Since the obvious response to childhood trauma is to go and traumatize others.

(Of course, I’m being sarcastic when I say that. Therapy is actually a nice alternative to sexual assault.)

I’m not a big fan of most of the authors I’ve mentioned here. The Eye of Minds by James Dashner was okay. The Bad Beginning by Lemony Snicket (Daniel Handler’s pseudonym) was also okay. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian was pretty good, but I wasn’t surprised when I heard of Sherman Alexie’s wrongdoings based on his book.

But I really loved the Michael Vey series. Richard Paul Evans was banned from Salt Lake Comic Con because of, it seems, a hug given without consent. Consent is very important, but kicking an author out of an event for a hug is, in my opinion, a bit of an overreaction. The later actions of Evans are what have turned me against him. He has compared the problems of white men today to the problems of Jews in the time before the Holocaust which I strongly believe is not okay.

But with all of these facts coming to light, we, as readers, now face the question of “Should we read books by authors who have sexually harassed people?”

That’s a really tough question.

On one hand, the content of a book won’t change if its author does something horrible.

On the other hand, reading a book and therefore supporting the author can say, “I’m going to keep being your ‘customer’ regardless of your actions. Do whatever you want.” That’s a message we definitely don’t want to send.

I think it’s up to each individual reader to decide how they will respond to an author’s sexual misconduct. You could burn the books by offending authors. You could restrict your reading to library books so as not to give offending authors more money. You could ignore all of this completely. It is your choice.

However, something every single person should do, no matter their reading habits, is encourage awareness of these issues. This article is only the tip of the sexual misconduct iceberg and I think we could all benefit from looking into it a bit more and educating ourselves on the issue.